堕胎权利 Abortion Right: Difference between revisions
From 时政文萃
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<font color="grey">当前位置:</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> → 堕胎权利</font> | |||
*'''[[Des Moines Register【我曾投票支持取缔堕胎的人。后来,我看到了投资于人是如何大大减少堕胎的。】]][https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/iowa-view/2020/10/02/abortion-reductions-better-chance-under-democrats-joe-biden/5878822002/ | I voted for people who would outlaw abortion. Then I saw how investing in people reduces abortions much more.]''' | |||
*'''[[Washington Post 【每位参议员是如何在《避孕权利法案》表决中投票的】]][https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2024/06/05/senate-vote-right-to-contraception-act-birth-control-access/ | How every senator voted on advancing the Right to Contraception Act]''' | |||
*'''[[Abortion, Everyday 【佛罗里达州共和党人违反法律,禁止堕胎】]][https://jessica.substack.com/p/florida-republicans-are-breaking | Florida Republicans Are Breaking the Law to Keep Abortion Banned]''' | |||
*'''[[New York Times 【观点: 特朗普无法摆脱堕胎的束缚】]][https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/06/opinion/trump-dobbs-abortion.html | Donald Trump Is Stuck]''' | |||
*'''[[Medium 【总统辩论期间对特朗普的事实核查(第一部分)】]][https://medium.com/the-polis/fact-checking-trump-during-the-presidential-debate-714882c2e27c Fact-Checking Trump During the Presidential Debate (Part One) ]''' | |||
*'''[[Abortion,Everyday【不要相信共和党党纲软化堕胎的谎言】]][https://jessica.substack.com/p/dont-fall-for-the-gops-platform-lie | Don't Fall for the GOP's Platform Lie]''' | |||
*'''[[Politico【共和党全国委员会批准删除党纲中国家对堕胎的限制 】]][https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/08/rnc-platform-national-abortion-limits-00166788 | RNC committee approves dropping national limits on abortion from party platform]''' | |||
*'''[[HuffPost - 赫芬顿邮报【早在《罗伊诉韦德案》判决之前,“怀孕警察 ”就已存在】]][https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-pregnancy-police-was-around-long-before-roe-v-wade-fell_n_66685d05e4b0c6ba4735641e | The ‘Pregnancy Police’ Were Around Long Before Roe v. Wade Fell]''' | |||
*'''[[Salon - 沙龙网【共和党人在众目睽睽之下隐瞒他们对避孕权的战争】]][https://www.salon.com/2024/06/06/hide-their-on-contraception-in-plain-sight/ | Republicans hide their war on contraception in plain sight]''' | |||
*'''[[The New Republic【共和党人正在加倍(甚至三倍)地强化堕胎限制】]][https://newrepublic.com/post/181625/republicans-more-abortion-restrictions-defy-voters | Republicans Are Doubling (and Tripling) Down on Abortion Restrictions]''' | |||
*'''[[The Good in Us【共和党将如何失败】]][https://marytrump.substack.com/p/how-republicans-will-fail?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 | How Republicans Will Fail]''' | |||
*'''[[The Nation【特朗普在堕胎问题上的唯一立场就是不惜一切代价争取再任】]][https://www.thenation.com/article/society/trump-position-abortion-whatever-it-takes/ | Trump’s Only Position on Abortion Is to Say Whatever It Takes to Get Reelected]''' | |||
*'''[[Semafor【阿拉巴马州民主党人在特朗普的领地翻转了一个席位】]][https://www.semafor.com/article/03/27/2024/democrats-flip-alabama-seat | The Alabama Democrat who flipped a seat in Trump country]''' | |||
*'''[[The New Republic【选民压制是反堕胎运动的秘诀】]][https://newrepublic.com/article/179333/anti-abortion-voter-suppression-movement | Voter Suppression Is the Anti-Abortion Movement’s Secret Sauce]''' | |||
*'''[[New York Times【让我们感谢阿拉巴马州最高法院】]][https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/opinion/alabama-abortion-ivf.html | Let’s Thank the Alabama Supreme Court]''' | |||
*'''[[Salon【先是堕胎,然后试管婴儿......现在节育?】]][https://www.salon.com/2024/02/27/first-abortion-then-ivf-and-now-birth-control/ | First abortion, then IVF… and now birth control?]''' | |||
*'''[[Lucian Truscott Newsletter 【让我们一起来看看宫外孕的形成过程吧!】]][https://luciantruscott.substack.com/p/lets-watch-the-making-of-an-extrauterine | Let's watch the making of an extrauterine child!]''' | |||
*'''[[The Nation【阿拉巴马州的试管婴儿裁决是伪装成法律的基督教神学】]][https://www.thenation.com/article/society/alabama-ivf-ruling/ | Alabama’s IVF Ruling Is Christian Theology Masquerading as Law]''' | |||
*'''[[AHMED BABA【阿拉巴马州的试管婴儿裁决是在特朗普盟友自称为 "基督教民族主义者 "的阴谋中做出的】]][https://www.ahmedbaba.news/p/alabamas-ivf-ruling-comes-amid-a?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 | Alabama's IVF Ruling Comes Amid A Self-Proclaimed "Christian Nationalist" Plot From Trump's Allies]''' | |||
*'''[[The Guardian【阿拉巴马州最高法院裁定冷冻胚胎为 "儿童"】]][https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/20/alabama-supreme-court-frozen-embryos-children-ruling-ivf | Alabama supreme court rules frozen embryos are ‘children’]''' | |||
*'''[[卫报【如何在后罗伊时代的美国支持堕胎服务】]][https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/25/how-to-support-abortion-access-rights-us-roe-wade-funds | How to support abortion access in a post-Roe America]''' | *'''[[卫报【如何在后罗伊时代的美国支持堕胎服务】]][https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/25/how-to-support-abortion-access-rights-us-roe-wade-funds | How to support abortion access in a post-Roe America]''' | ||
*'''[[The Conversation【美国最高法院在堕胎裁决中未能维护美国的自由和平等理想】]]''' | *'''[[The Conversation【美国最高法院在堕胎裁决中未能维护美国的自由和平等理想】]][https://theconversation.com/the-u-s-supreme-court-failed-to-uphold-american-ideals-of-liberty-and-equality-in-abortion-ruling-188491 | The U.S. Supreme Court failed to uphold American ideals of liberty and equality in abortion ruling]''' |
Latest revision as of 21:08, 9 October 2024
当前位置: 首页 → 堕胎权利
- Des Moines Register【我曾投票支持取缔堕胎的人。后来,我看到了投资于人是如何大大减少堕胎的。】 | I voted for people who would outlaw abortion. Then I saw how investing in people reduces abortions much more.
- Washington Post 【每位参议员是如何在《避孕权利法案》表决中投票的】every senator voted on advancing the Right to Contraception Act
- Abortion, Everyday 【佛罗里达州共和党人违反法律,禁止堕胎】 | Florida Republicans Are Breaking the Law to Keep Abortion Banned
- Politico【共和党全国委员会批准删除党纲中国家对堕胎的限制 】 | RNC committee approves dropping national limits on abortion from party platform
- HuffPost - 赫芬顿邮报【早在《罗伊诉韦德案》判决之前,“怀孕警察 ”就已存在】 | The ‘Pregnancy Police’ Were Around Long Before Roe v. Wade Fell
- The New Republic【共和党人正在加倍(甚至三倍)地强化堕胎限制】 | Republicans Are Doubling (and Tripling) Down on Abortion Restrictions
- The Nation【特朗普在堕胎问题上的唯一立场就是不惜一切代价争取再任】 | Trump’s Only Position on Abortion Is to Say Whatever It Takes to Get Reelected
- The Nation【阿拉巴马州的试管婴儿裁决是伪装成法律的基督教神学】 | Alabama’s IVF Ruling Is Christian Theology Masquerading as Law