宪政危机 Constitutional Crisis: Difference between revisions
From 时政文萃
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> → 宪政危机</font> | <font color="grey">当前位置：</font>[[时政文萃 | 首页]]<font color="grey"> → 宪政危机</font> | ||
*'''[[The Hill【观点-特朗普的选票删除案取决于这些关键问题 】]][https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4434430-trumps-ballot-removal-cases-hinge-on-these-key-questions/ | Trump’s ballot removal cases hinge on these key questions]''' | |||
*'''[[Fine-Tuned Finances【法官拒绝特朗普叛乱案中的“总统豁免权”辩护】]][https://www.finetunedfinances.com/2024/01/27/judges-reject-presidential-immunity-defense-in-trumps-insurrection-case/ | JUDGES REJECT ‘PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY’ DEFENSE IN TRUMP’S INSURRECTION CASE]''' | *'''[[Fine-Tuned Finances【法官拒绝特朗普叛乱案中的“总统豁免权”辩护】]][https://www.finetunedfinances.com/2024/01/27/judges-reject-presidential-immunity-defense-in-trumps-insurrection-case/ | JUDGES REJECT ‘PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY’ DEFENSE IN TRUMP’S INSURRECTION CASE]''' | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 29 January 2024
当前位置： 首页 → 宪政危机
- Fine-Tuned Finances【法官拒绝特朗普叛乱案中的“总统豁免权”辩护】 | JUDGES REJECT ‘PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY’ DEFENSE IN TRUMP’S INSURRECTION CASE
- Huffpost【共和党人正在抓稻草，宣称如果特朗普被取消选票，将进行报复】 | Republicans Are Grasping At Straws To Promise Retribution If Trump Is Taken Off The Ballot
- Ahmed Baba【"特朗普主义制度化"： 传统基金会主席在 "2025 项目 "访谈中直言不讳】 | “Institutionalizing Trumpism": Heritage Foundation President's Revealing Project 2025 Interview
